![]() Did Moses mistake “the angel of the Lord” for “a natural gas seep that was ignited by lightning”? Once again we are forced to believe that Moses was an ignorant and superstitious bedouin who did not have the sense to check out what PM maintains was a common occurrence in the desert. Third, how did Moses know that this unique phenomenon, never witnessed before and never to be repeated again, would take place at this precise time? Ten days would not have been enough time to fulfill the biblical requirement that “the sons of Israel went through the midst of the sea on dry land” (Ex. First, has anyone observed such a phenomenon happening again since the time of Moses? Second, is it possible that the sea bottom would be dry enough for the Israelites to pass through? The mud would have been at least a foot thick, and ten hours of wind would not be enough to dry the ground. It goes like this: “Because of the peculiar geography of the northern end of the Red Sea, a moderate wind blowing constantly for about 10 hours could have caused the sea to recede about a mile and the water level to drop 10 ft., leaving dry land for a period of time before crashing back when the winds died down.”Ī few questions immediately come to mind. Liberals have been pushing the strong-wind view for decades. PM concludes that the biblical authors could not tell the difference between a miracle and a phenomenon of nature.įor example, the PM version of Moses parting the Red Sea is inventive but not very original. If the biblical writers do not give an accurate assessment of historical events, then their judgment in all matters must be considered suspect. There are staggering theological consequences for those who follow this operating presupposition. The folks at PM do not come out and say it, but the Bible is assumed to be a compilation of myths and superstitions that are naturally a part of the pre-scientific ancient era. The editors wrote: “Technology and a better understanding of natural processes may explain how these seemingly impossible events occurred.” In the December 1996 issue of Popular Mechanics ( PM), an attempt was made to use science to explain a number of biblical miracles. ![]() I could be wrong, but history is on my side. Call me cynical, but I don’t trust skeptics with the Bible. On December 5, 2004, the Discovery Channel will, I believe, attempt to explain away the miracles of Exodus. ![]() The Flash video ends with these questions: “Do you dare question what is in the Bible?. When you do, you will find a slick video presentation depicting the ten plagues on Egypt. There are no pictures, just a one-line web address: At the bottom of the ad, the reader is dared to check it out. Have you seen the Wrath of God advertisement? It’s a one-page ad that has been appearing in big-market, big-name magazines like Time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |